Papaya Global vs EBS PaySuite: Which Payroll Software Is Better?

Both Papaya Global and EBS PaySuite are leading payroll software solutions, but which one is better for you and your business?

Below we compare Papaya Global and EBS PaySuite across nearly 50 different data points to help you make find the right one.

Papaya Global vs EBS PaySuite Reviews

	Papaya Global	EBS PaySuite
Trustpilot Rating	2.6	0
Number of Trustpilot Reviews	6	0
iPhone App Rating	0	0
Number of iPhone App Reviews	0	0
Android App Rating	0	0
Number of Android App Reviews	0	0

	Papaya Global	EBS PaySuite
Free Trial	n/a	n/a
Free Trial Length	n/a	n/a
Cheapest Plan Name	Payroll Platform License	n/a
Cheapest Plan Cost Per Month	$150	$n/a
Mid Priced Plan Name	Data and Insights Platform License	n/a
Mid Priced Plan Cost Per Month	$150	$n/a
Top Plan Name	Employer of Record	n/a
Top Plan Cost Per Month	$650	$n/a

Features	Papaya Global	EBS PaySuite
Target Business Size	Enterprise	Mid size business
Unlimited Payrolls	✘	✘
Automated Tax Filing & Payments	✔	✔
E-sign I-9 & W-4	✘	✘
Live Customer Support	✘	✘
Third-Party Integrations	✔	✔
Ability To Manage Employee Benefits	✔	✔
Employee Access To Platform	✔	✔
Direct Deposit	✔	✔
Expense Reimbursement	✔	✘
Time Off Accrual	✔	✘
Pre-Tax Deductions	✔	✔
Wage Garnishment	✔	✔
Background Checks	✘	✘
Check Printing	✘	✘
Check Delivery	✘	✔
API	✔	✘

Upgrade your payroll and payments technology without replacing your payroll partners
No need to rip and replace your existing payroll network
Quickest “Go Live” on the market

n/a

n/a

	Papaya Global	EBS PaySuite
Pros	Payment processing through Papaya Global is safe with GDPR and SOC Compliance and no third-party involvement. High level of customization within the HRIS system. Robust analytics for predictive analytics, financial forecasting and comprehensive insights.	All In One Place Comprehensive Solution Easy Processes One Stop Shop Reporting
Cons	Expensive compared to alternative PEO software solutions. Papaya Global has an EOR aggregator model, meaning that it uses a network of ICPs, and does not own EOR subsidiaries or legal entities in the countries it services. The solution lacks HR features commonly present in other PEO solutions, like performance monitoring and training management tools.	Integration Issues Need Improvements Technical Issues